Ask A Lawyer

Tell Us Your Case Information for Fastest Lawyer Match!

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involoves.
Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided may not be privileged or confidential.


by Coleen D. St. Clair on Jan. 17, 2019


Summary: When an individual under the age of 18 has been apprehended for allegedly committing a crime, their whole future is at stake.


Posted by Coleen D. St. Clair | Jan 20, 2017 | 0 Comments


When an individual under the age of 18 has been apprehended for allegedly committing a crime, their whole future is at stake. Depending on the nature of the crime, a conviction can create limitations that stifle their eligibility for government aid and hinder potential job prospects. If charged as a sex offender, they will have to adhere to strict residency requirements and be registered in an online database for all to see; consequences that far exceed their time of being a minor. Such serious repercussions should motivate law enforcement and investigators to be 100% sure that the child committed the crime before sentencing them, even with a confession.

Most people think that once a confession has been given, the case is closed. They assume there's nothing more to prove when the suspect actually admits to being guilty. But many cases and a multitude of studies say otherwise, especially in cases involving minors. A recent report released by the Innocence Project stated that about 38% of exonerations for crimes allegedly committed by minors involved false confessions. These alarming statistics pose concerns regarding what's going on in the interrogation room, and why false confessions from juveniles are occurring so often.

Researchers who've dedicated their time to studying this phenomenon say it has a lot to do with how minors respond to authority. They may create a fictitious statement because they think that's what the investigator wants to hear. Analysts also credit the confessions to a minor's incapability of understanding the long-term consequences of a conviction. When undergoing an interrogation (which can be incredibly terrifying and intimidating for a child), they may be merely interested in short-term gratification. Which means, in their mind, confessing to a crime they didn't commit results in them being able to escape the situation; An outcome that most adults know is unlikely. Many investigators will use a child's vulnerability as an easy way to garner a confession, even if it's untrue.

These circumstances were present in the infamous case involving Brendan Dassey - a Wisconsin teen who was sentenced to mandatory life in prison for the murder and sexual assault of a woman. Dassey's lawyers asserted that the 16-year-old was tricked into admitting how he raped, tortured, murdered, and mutilated the corpse of Teresa Halbach after a grueling four hour interrogation. Just last year, his conviction was overturned on the basis that the confession was unconstitutionally coerced. Dassey, whose IQ is below 70, had no defense lawyer present throughout the whole ordeal.

Research and cases like Dassey's has created the opportunity to address the need for reform in policies regarding young suspects. Over 20 states require the recording of custodial interrogations through court action or law; Washington is not one of these states. Which is all the more reason to hire legal representation as soon as possible.

If your child has been apprehended or charged with a criminal offense, they have a right to a quality legal defense. Call seasoned juvenile defense attorney Coleen St. Clair at St. Clair Law Offices. 

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See's full Terms of Use for more information.