Municipality Found Liable in Summer Camp Drowning

by Joseph C. Maya on May. 01, 2017

Accident & Injury Personal Injury Accident & Injury  Wrongful Death Government  State and Local 

Summary: Blog about a municipality that was found liable for the death of a minor child who drowned on town property.

Contact the personal injury attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. today. We can help you get the just compensation you deserve for your injuries or those of a loved one. For a free initial consultation, call 203-221-3100 or email JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

The jury could have inferred that the decedent's drowning was an "active" drowning and it would not have been unreasonable for the jury to infer a causal connection between the "supervisory" negligence of defendants and the drowning. Defendants, the city and certain city camp counselors, moved to set aside the jury's verdict rendered after a trial in which plaintiff administratrix of the estate of her five year old son claimed that the negligence of those defendants and five others caused the drowning death of her son at a day camp operated by the city. Defendants also moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

The administratrix's son drowned while participating in a city camp. Defendants argued that the administratrix failed to prove beyond the realm of surprise and speculation that defendants' negligence caused decedent's death. The court held that evidence had been introduced that defendants were informed that the decedent could not swim and that adequate measures had not been in place to ensure that none of the children in their care would drown. The court held that the jury was allowed to rely on circumstantial evidence and to draw inferences from that evidence to conclude that defendants had been negligent when the decedent drowned. The court held further that the applicable standard of care was a question of fact based on the circumstances in the case and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The court denied the motion to set aside the verdict and the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and ordered that judgment be entered in favor of the administratrix.

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our personal injury attorneys are dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their family members and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury, whether caused by a motor vehicle or pedestrian accident, a slip and fall, medical malpractice, a defective product, or otherwise. Our attorneys are not afraid to aggressively pursue and litigate cases and have extensive experience litigating personal injury matters in both state and federal courts, and always with regard to the unique circumstances of our client and the injury he or she has sustained.

Please contact Joseph C. Maya, Esq., at 203-221-3100, or at JMaya@mayalaw.com, to schedule a free consultation.

Source: Spruill v. Downing, 1995 Conn. Super LEXIS 2542 (Conn. Super. Ct. Sep 05, 1995)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.