Payday Lender Sentenced To 16 Years In Prison

by Malcolm Ruthven on Mar. 22, 2018

 General Practice 

Summary: The owner of a payday lending operation was sentenced to more than 16 years in prison, and the general counsel (attorney) for the business was sentenced to 7 years.

The owner of a payday lending operation was sentenced to more than 16 years in prison, and the general counsel (attorney) for the business was sentenced to 7 years.

"For more than 15 years, Scott Tucker and Timothy Muir made billions of dollars exploiting struggling, everyday Americans through payday loans carrying interest rates as high as 1,000 percent," said acting deputy U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Joan Loughnane in a written statement. "And to hide their criminal scheme, they tried to claim their business was owned and operated by Native American tribes. But now Tucker and Muir's predatory business is closed and they have been sentenced to significant time in prison for their deceptive practices."

The businesses, operating under brand names like 500FastCash and Ameriloan, charged interest rates ranging from 400 percent to 700 percent, far beyond rates permitted by states that regulate payday lending.

They duped customers by automatically withdrawing interest payments from a loan balance while not touching the principal amount so that the loan would renew on the consumer's next payday. The result was that a $500 loan could turn into nearly $2,000 in repayments.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.