Prior Separation Agreement Subject to Court Review

author by Joseph C. Maya on May. 05, 2017

Divorce & Family Law Divorce & Family Law  Divorce Lawsuit & Dispute  Lawsuit 

Summary: Blog post about how a separation agreement is subject to court review before a binding judgement for legal separation will be granted.

If you have questions about divorce, legal separation, alimony pendente lite, or alimony in Connecticut, please feel free to call the experienced divorce attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. in Westport today at 203-221-3100 or email Joseph C. Maya, Esq. at JMaya@Mayalaw.com

A separation agreement made several years before a judgment for legal separation is subject to the court’s discretion in fairness and equity before incorporation.

The parties’ received a judgment of legal separation on January 11, 2007. The judgment incorporated an agreement to the terms and conditions of the separation including a parenting plan, alimony provision and the division of their real and personal property. In May 2009, the defendant husband filed a motion to reopen the judgment, claiming he was forced into the agreement by not being properly prepared for the trial in January 2007.

The court found that a review of the 2007 separation agreement was proper. While there is some debate as to a court’s role in reviewing the fairness and equity of a separation agreement, the court found that such inquiries have become standardized in Connecticut courts. A separation agreement is not intended to displace the judicial powers of the court. The 2007 was executed approximately five years before the case at hand. The court reasoned that all parties’ should be adequately noticed to such conditions in the furtherance of due process of law. A review of the agreement would prevent an inequitable execution of an unjust contractual agreement.

For a free consultation, please do not hesitate to call the experienced family law and divorce attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. in Westport, CT at 203-221-3100. We may also be reached for inquiries by email at JMaya@mayalaw.com.

Source: Meeks v. Meeks, 2013 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1697 (Sup. Ct. Conn. 2013).

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.

© 2025 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.