Restaurant Reckless in Patron's Drunken Assault of Customer

by Joseph C. Maya on May. 01, 2017

Accident & Injury Accident & Injury  Personal Injury Business 

Summary: Blog about a restaurant that was found liable for the drunken assault of a patron by another customer who was drunk.

Contact the personal injury attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. today. We can help you get the just compensation you deserve for your injuries or those of a loved one. For a free initial consultation, call 203-221-3100 or email JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

Plaintiff injured patron sued defendants, a restaurant, a company, and an alleged assailant, for negligence. One count alleged the injuries were caused by the "gross negligence and reckless and wanton conduct" of the restaurant, its agents, or employees. The restaurant claimed, inter alia, that Connecticut law did not recognize a cause of action for "gross negligence" and that the allegations were insufficient to state a claim for recklessness.

The injured patron alleged that while at the restaurant he was assaulted by the alleged assailant. The court held that the recklessness count alleged, among other things, that the restaurant or its agents served or continued to serve alcoholic beverages to the assailant when they knew that the assailant was impaired, was a danger to other patrons because of the impairment, and was unable to deal responsibly with the decision whether he should continue to drink. That count further alleged that the conduct took place under circumstances when the restaurant failed to supervise the distribution of alcohol on the premises and when it maintained an alcohol policy which allowed service of alcohol to impaired persons. The court could not say as a matter of law that the injured patron failed to state a cause of action for recklessness when it was claimed that a purveyor of alcohol dispensed alcohol to a patron with the knowledge and the policy as alleged. The patron conceded that his complaint failed to allege that the company committed any tortious acts. Also, under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 30-102, he had no cause of action for the negligent sale of alcohol to the assailant. The motion to strike was granted as to two counts against the restaurant and a company. The motion was denied as to a count which alleged recklessness and gross negligence.

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our personal injury attorneys are dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their family members and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury, whether caused by a motor vehicle or pedestrian accident, a slip and fall, medical malpractice, a defective product, or otherwise. Our attorneys are not afraid to aggressively pursue and litigate cases and have extensive experience litigating personal injury matters in both state and federal courts, and always with regard to the unique circumstances of our client and the injury he or she has sustained.

Source: Czajkowski v. Billiards, 2006 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2795 (September 15, 2006)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.