Trial Court Invalidates Prenuptial Agreement Where Husband Failed to Disclose Substantial Pension

by Joseph C. Maya on Mar. 27, 2024

Divorce & Family Law 

Summary: In a divorce action, the Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial Branch of Fairfield at Bridgeport considered a plaintiff husband’s claims that he and his wife signed a valid prenuptial agreement and, as such, any awards by the court inconsistent with the agreement’s terms would be improper.

Case Background

In this case, the husband and defendant wife lived in Trumbull, Connecticut, and entered into a premarital agreement (hereinafter agreement) the day before their wedding. Whether the wife had counsel at the time the agreement was signed was questionable: the husband’s attorney testified that though she recalled the presence of another attorney, she did not know if the wife had hired him. Approximately four years after the agreement was executed, the husband received a lump sum pension from his employer. Though he testified at the dissolution proceedings that the value was at least $100,000, this was a gross undervaluation: rather, the lump sum payment was nearly $700,000.

The Court’s Decision

The trial court found the agreement unenforceable for multiple reasons, with the husband’s failure to fully disclose his assets at the forefront. The husband’s failure to reveal the actual value of his pension was a material omission, and because the wife did not have independent knowledge of those assets, the husband violated his duty to disclose. As the trial court stated, “For this reason alone the premarital agreement fails.” The agreement also required each party to perform due diligence in finding out the other party’s assets, a burden that the court will not impose. The duty is to disclose, not to discover.

Finally, the court found problematic the vague evidence regarding whether the wife had independent counsel at the time the agreement was signed. Therefore, the court declared the agreement unenforceable and, within its authority, made financial awards pursuant to the dissolution of the marriage.


Maya Murphy P.C. has proudly been included in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®, ranked among the top firms in the nation. In addition, Managing Partner Joseph C. Maya has been selected to The Best Lawyers in America® 2024 for his work in Employment Law and Education Law in Connecticut. Recognition in Best Lawyers® is awarded to firms and attorneys who demonstrate excellence in the industry, and is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor.

Our firm in Westport, Connecticut serves clients with legal assistance all over the state, including the towns of: Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Bethany, Bethel, Branford, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Cheshire, Danbury, Darien, Derby, East Haven, Easton, Fairfield, Greenwich, Guilford, Hamden, Madison, Meriden, Middlebury, Milford, Monroe, Naugatuck, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Haven, Newton, North Branford, North Haven, Norwalk, Orange, Oxford, Prospect, Redding, Ridgefield, Seymour, Shelton, Sherman, Southbury, Stamford, Stratford, Trumbull, Wallingford, Waterbury, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wilton, and Woodbridge. In addition to assisting clients in Connecticut, our firm handles education law and employment law matters in New York as well. 

If you have any questions about employment law or education law in Connecticut, or would like to speak to an attorney about a legal matter, please contact Joseph C. Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com to schedule a free initial consultation today.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.