USCIS Proposes Rule on EADs Related to Pending Asylum Applications

by Eliza Grinberg on Nov. 22, 2019

Immigration Immigration  Deportation Immigration  Visa 

Summary: On November 13, 2019, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) proposed a new rule in the Federal Register titled “Asylum Application, Interview, and Employment Authorization for Applicants.”

immigration attorney nycOn November 13, 2019, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) proposed a new rule in the Federal Register titled “Asylum Application, Interview, and Employment Authorization for Applicants” [PDF version]. The rule is open for public comment through January 13, 2019. It is important to note that no provisions of the rule are currently in effect.

The USCIS summarized the proposed rule on its website [PDF version]. It explains that the rule was prompted by President Donald Trump's April 29, 2019, Presidential Memorandum on Additional Measures to Enhance Border Security and Restore Integrity to Our Immigration System [PDF version].

The USCIS is proposing preventing most aliens who enter the United States illegally from obtaining employment authorization on the basis of long-pending asylum applications. It is also proposing preventing aliens who file their asylum applications more than one year after their last entry into the United States — lawful or otherwise — from obtaining employment authorization on the basis of a pending asylum application. For asylum applicants who may be otherwise eligible for employment authorization, the USCIS is proposing considering certain federal or state felonies and other criminal offenses as bars to employment authorization based on pending asylum applications. Additionally, “[u]nresolved arrests or pending charges may result in the denial of the application for employment authorization as a matter of discretion.”

The proposed rule includes a provision clarifying that if an asylum applicant fails to appear at a required appointment relating to the asylum application, his or her entire application may be dismissed. In addition or in the alternative, failure to appear at a required appointment could lead to the denial of employment authorization relating to that application.

Finally, the rule proposes automatically terminating grants of employment authorization relating to pending asylum applications when the denial of an application becomes administratively final.

As it stands, the proposed rule would narrow the classes of asylum applicants eligible for employment authorization based on pending applications. The provisions relating to illegal entry and criminal charges and convictions could be especially significant in this regard. As we noted at earlier, however, none of the proposals are currently in effect. The USCIS will likely receive many comments both for and against the proposals during the comment period, and it may modify any final rule in accordance with public feedback. It is too early to say whether a final rule will ever take effect or how it may differ from the proposed rule if it does.

We will monitor the proposed rule-making regarding asylum employment authahorization and update the website with more information when it is available.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.