USCIS Reissuing Receipt Notices to Ceratin EAD Renewal Applicants Who Revived Automatic Extensions

by Alexander J. Segal on Mar. 30, 2017

Immigration Immigration  Deportation Immigration  Visa 

Summary: On February 1, 2017, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that on January 17, 2017, it automatically extended certain expiring Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for up to 180 days for certain renewal applicants.

immigration attorney nycUSCIS ANNOUNCES AUTOMATIC EXTENSIONS FOR EAD RENEWAL APPLICANTS IN CERTAIN CATEGORIES

On February 1, 2017, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that on January 17, 2017, it automatically extended certain expiring Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for up to 180 days for certain renewal applicants [link]. In order to be a beneficiary of the automatic extension, the individual must have been seeking to renew an EAD in one of the following [see article] EAD categories.

Provided that the individual was seeking renewal in one of the above categories:

- He or she must have properly filed for a renewal EAD before his or her current EAD expired; and
- The category on the current EAD must match the “Class Requested” on the current Notice of Action.

The USCIS explains that for applicants for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) [see category], both the EAD and the Notice of Action must contain either the (a)(12) or (c)(19) categories, but the categories do not need to match.

The USCIS stated that the reason for the automatic extensions was "to help prevent gaps in employment authorization and documentation." The extension applies to Form I-765 renewal applications that were still pending on January 17, 2017, and to Form I - 765 applications that were filed on or after January 17, 2017.

USCIS ANNOUNCES THAT IT WILL REISSUE RECEIPT NOTICES

On February 24, 2017, the USCIS announced that starting on February 16, 2017, it began reissuing Form I-797, Receipt Notices, to individuals who had applied to renew their EADs between July 21, 2016, and January 16, 2017, and whose applications remain pending in all of the categories listed in the previous section, except for (a)(12) and (c)(19) [link]. The USCIS is sending the new receipt notices because the receipt notices that the USCIS had sent out did not contain the applicant's EAD eligibility category. The new receipt notices will contain the following information:

- The applicant's EAD eligibility category;
- The receipt date (the date on which the USCIS received the renewal application);
- The notice date (the date on which the USCIS reissued the receipt notice); and
- New information about the 180-day EAD extension.

The new receipt notices will help applicants demonstrate to their employers that they are employment authorized. The USCIS explains that applicants may present the reissued receipt notice with their expired EAD to their employer as a List A document for the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.

Applicants with a TPS-related EAD who filed their renewal applications before January 17, 2017, will not receive a reissued receipt notice. This is because these applicants already received 6-month extensions through the Federal Register notice that extended their country's TPS designation.

CONCLUSION

The USCIS decided to offer short automatic extensions to expired EADs in certain categories to prevent gaps from forming while renewal applications are pending. The USCIS's reissuance of receipt notices to most of these applicants will provide them with evidence of continued employment authorization. Applicants with questions about their specific cases should consult with an experienced immigration attorney.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.