Virtual Assets and Real Advice - Clients Need Candid Advice Regarding their Digital Assets (10 of 10)
Estate Estate Planning Estate Trusts Estate Wills & Probate
Summary: More and more people are storing photos, personal correspondence, private information and even valuable assets online. Lawyers need to guide their clients with care in this ever changing world of digital estate planning.
Virtual Assets and Real Advice
Clients Need Candid
Advice Regarding their Digital Assets
Marcus
Seiter
(Part 10 of 10 part series)
V.
Best Practices: The Competent Advisor Model
With so much at stake amid so many uncertainties, it
is incumbent upon the estate planning community to develop and promote best
practices in planning for digital assets.
A. Developing Best Practices
The efforts made by the American College of Trust
and Estate College (“ACTEC”) serve as an excellent model for developing best
practices.[i]
ACTEC is a long standing professional association of estate planning attorneys
who strive for “integrity, commitment to the profession, competence and
experience as trust and estate counselors.”[ii]
At the end of the 1980’s, ACTEC’s board of regents saw a need to provide “explicit
guidance regarding the professional responsibilities of lawyers engaged in a
trusts and estates practice.”[iii] After four years of work, they published the
first edition of ACTEC Commentaries on the Model Rules of Professional Conduct
(“Commentaries”) on October13, 1993.[iv] The Commentaries are meant to harmonize the
restrictions of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct (“Model Rules”) with
the ethical needs of an estate planning practice.[v] The Commentaries refer to specific Model
Rules and provide “particularized guidance” for applying them to estate
planning[vi]. The Model Rules along with the ACTEC
Commentaries have become an invaluable resource for estate planners who wish to
ethically meet the needs of their clients.[vii]
ACTEC should augment future editions of
its commentaries to include best practices for digital estate planning. Best practices for digital estate planning
should be similarly grounded in the Model Rules with particular emphasis on the
primary role of a planner: competent advisor.
B. Best Practices: Competence
Competence is the first Model Rule.[viii] In order to be competent, a planner must have
a sufficient “legal knowledge and skill in the particular matter.”[ix]
If the matter concerns a client’s
digital estate, the planner needs to first understand digital assets
generally. This means having at least a
basic understanding of the nature of digital assets and the very limited rights
pertaining to those stored online. Digital
estate planners must also understand the limitations of applying traditional
estate planning methods to digital assets.
Both the Model Rules and ACTEC allow for planners to gain competence by
attending continuing legal education (CLE) or by studying relevant material in
law journals or treatises.[x] However, gaining competence through
self-study can be very difficult in an emerging area of the law like digital
estate planning. The estate planning
industry must do more to provide education about digital estate planning.
There are several groups that seek to provide
professional resources and education to estate planners.[xi]
For example, the American Bar
Association Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law (“RPTE”) prides
itself on providing “leadership and subject matter expertise on current
regulatory and legal issues, trends, and best practices with the singular goal
of empowering [its] members to better serve their clients.”[xii]
RPTE has tremendous influence with a membership of almost 25,000 lawyers,
educators, students, and financial professionals across the globe.[xiii]
RPTE extends this influence to its
members through a quarterly law journal, a bi-monthly magazine, and regular continuing
legal education (CLE) events – all of which focus on aspects within real
property, trust, and estate law.[xiv]
RPTE also extends its influence through
member committees designed to provide legislatures and the community at large
with information and education regarding “emerging legal issues.”[xv]
RPTE should form a committee dedicated
to providing more CLE’s and more content for RPTE publications promoting
digital estate planning best practices.
Because RPTE has such a large reach, even modest efforts in this area
could have a big impact in furthering the digital estate planning movement.
C. Best Practices: Advisor
Estate planners that function primarily as advisors are
duty bound to “exercise professional judgment and render candid advice.”[xvi] A competent advisor should seek to understand
the extent of a client’s digital assets and what the client’s wishes are
concerning them. At this point a planner
must be honest about the likelihood of meeting the client’s wishes with respect
of each digital asset. For many digital
assets, especially those stored online, a client must be told that there may be
little or nothing the planner can do. An
advisor should caution against using traditional methods that have not are not
likely to work for digital estate planning.[xvii] On the other hand, if the planner or client
wants to limit the scope of the engagement to exclude planning for any digital
assets, such a decision must be made by informed consent.[xviii]
V.
Conclusion
The time has come for the formulation of best
practices in digital estate planning. Owners
of digital assets expect to have control over the disposition of their digital
assets at death or incapacity.
Unfortunately, the law has not kept pace protecting the dispositional
rights in these assets. In order to
traverse the restrictive legal landscape as it stands today, clients need
better advice. In the absence of
specific guidelines, the estate planning industry must set to work to develop
best practices for handling digital estates.
Although there may be little that can be done for some of these assets,
both the client and the planner will be better off if the client is made aware
of the risks and dispositional limitations imposed on his digital assets. Such candid advice allows the client to make
informed decisions, which in turn helps minimize unwanted surprises that could
undermine the credibility of the digital estate planning movement.
[i] About ACTEC, http://www.actec.org/public/AboutACTEC.asp (last
visited Jul. 8, 2014).
[ii] Id.
[iii] John Price, New Guidance on Ethics for
Estate Planners, 22 Est.
Plan. 17.
[iv] The ACTEC Commentaries on the
Model Rules of Professional Conduct, ST022 ALI-ABA 1039, 1043.
[v] See Price, supra n. 181.
[vi] Id.
[vii] Id.
[viii] Rule 1.1, supra n. 15.
[ix] Id.
[x] See Id; See also, Commentaries on the Mod. Rules Prof. Cond.,
American Coll. of Trust & Estate Counsel, 15 (2006) available at http://www.actec.org/Documents/misc/ACTEC_Commentaries_4th_02_14_06.pdf.
[xi] See, e.g., American Acad. Of Estate Planning Attorneys,
http://aaepa.com/about-the-academy/ (last visited (Jul. 8, 2014) American
Bar Ass’n. Section of Real Prop., Trust & Estate Law,
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/real_property_trust_estate.html (last visited
Jul 8, 2014); American Coll. of Trust & Estate Counsel, supra n. 179;
Nat’l. Acad. of Elder Law Attorneys, http://www.naela.org (last visited Jul. 8,
2014); Nat’l. Ass’n.
of Estate Planners & Councils, http://www.naepc.org (last visited Jul. 8,
2014); Nat’l. Inst. of Certified Estate Planners,
http://nicep.org (last visited Jul. 8, 2014).
[xii] Id.
[xiii] See American Bar Ass’n. Section of Real Prop., Trust &
Estate Law, supra n.
189.
[xiv] RPTE Member Benefits, American Bar Ass’n. Section of Real Prop., Trust &
Estate Law,
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/real_property_trust_estate/membership/membership_benefits.html
(last visited Jul 8, 2014);
[xv] Committees & Task Forces, American Bar
Ass’n. Section of Real Prop., Trust & Estate Law,
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/real_property_trust_estate/committees.html
(last visited Jul. 9, 2014).
[xvi] See Rule 2.1, supra n. 15.
[xvii] See Id; See also, Rule
1.2 Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority between Client and
Lawyer, Ann. Mod. Rules Prof. Cond. § 1.2.
[xviii] See Rule 1.2, supra n. 195.