The Supreme Court of Canada has unanimously ruled that the Criminal Code provision against aiding and abetting someone to commit suicide, unjustifiably violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court found that the criminal law deprives people, who are suffering from grievous and irremediable medical conditions, of the right to life, liberty and security of the person.

It is important to note that the rule does not apply to “everyone” and “anyone”. The court limited the application to physician assisted suicides to “a competent adult person who clearly consents to the termination of life and has a grievous and irremediable medical condition, including an illness, disease or disability, that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition.” This will be the perimeter for who the rule applies to and when the rule applies.

Whats next for this unprecedented decision?

*Determining how this rule will be controlled and regulated.

Parliament and the provincial legislatures need to respond by enacting legislation consistent with the constitutional parameters set out in the decision. The government will most likely turn to the physicians’ colleges for direction and support, along with other interests groups. Considerations need to be made in assessing the Charter rights of both the physician and the patient. There are many groups who are advocating for a physician’s right to choose not to participate in the rule. The Canadian Medical Association has asked for a legislative scheme that will legally protect both the physicians who choose to provide this new intervention as well as the physicians who choose not to provide the new intervention.

 What happens in the mean time?

*The rule is suspended.

 The Court has suspended the declaration (or decision) for one year. In essence, the court pushed the “pause” button on the new rule. This suspension provides time for Parliament to figure out how to regulate and control the decision. The court has made it clear that there will be no exceptions allowed during this suspension time; Canadians will need to wait a little bit longer.


Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.