Bellingham Divorce Lawyer, Washington, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Newcombe
About Us | Services
Washington Family Law Group, PLLC
Proudly Serving The Greater Puget Sound RegionÂ» view map
Divorce, Family Law, Child Support
CONTACT US FOR A CONSULTATION

Family law and divorce can be quite complex, and it takes much experience and many years of practice to fully comprehend the complexity.

800-699-2370
1. Jason Newcombe Seattle, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 1999
  Boston College Law School, J.D. - 1997
2. About UsServing Washington
  Offices in Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Everett, and Olympia
3. ServicesExperienced Attorneys
  We always offer a free initial consultation and case evaluation
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Includes: Alimony & Spousal Support

Not enough matches for Bellingham Divorce lawyer.
Below are all Bellingham Divorce & Family Law lawyers.

Gregory Louis Kosanke

Litigation, Family Law, Civil Rights, Contract

Status: Deceased Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

105 5Th St, Lynden, WA 98264

David G. Laidman

Elder Law, Estate Planning, Guardianships & Conservatorships, Wills

Status: Inactive Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

2519 17Th St, Anacortes, WA 98221

Luigi Colombo

Collaborative Law, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

1621 Freeway Dr, Mount Vernon, WA 98273

Sara Grigas

Wills, Estate Planning, Guardianships & Conservatorships, Elder Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

Anacortes, WA 98221

Richard Lee

Federal, Family Law, Contract, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

1733 H St, Blaine, WA 98230

Rajeev D Majumdar

Estate Planning, Family Law, Civil Rights, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

289 H St, Blaine, WA 98230

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEST INTERESTS (OF THE CHILD)

The test that courts use when deciding who will take care of a child. For instance, an adoption is allowed only when a court declares it to be in the best inter... (more...)

The test that courts use when deciding who will take care of a child. For instance, an adoption is allowed only when a court declares it to be in the best interests of the child. Similarly, when asked to decide on custody issues in a divorce case, the judge will base his or her decision on the child's best interests. And the same test is used when judges decide whether a child should be removed from a parent's home because of neglect or abuse. Factors considered by the court in deciding the best interests of a child include: age and sex of the child mental and physical health of the child mental and physical health of the parents lifestyle and other social factors of the parents emotional ties between the parents and the child ability of the parents to provide the child with food, shelter, clothing and medical care established living pattern for the child concerning school, home, community and religious institution quality of schooling, and the child's preference.

PREMARITAL AGREEMENT

An agreement made by a couple before marriage that controls certain aspects of their relationship, usually the management and ownership of property, and sometim... (more...)

An agreement made by a couple before marriage that controls certain aspects of their relationship, usually the management and ownership of property, and sometimes whether alimony will be paid if the couple later divorces. Courts usually honor premarital agreements unless one person shows that the agreement was likely to promote divorce, was written with the intention of divorcing or was entered into unfairly. A premarital agreement may also be known as a 'prenuptial agreement.'

CUSTODY (OF A CHILD)

The legal authority to make decisions affecting a child's interests (legal custody) and the responsibility of taking care of the child (physical custody). When ... (more...)

The legal authority to make decisions affecting a child's interests (legal custody) and the responsibility of taking care of the child (physical custody). When parents separate or divorce, one of the hardest decisions they have to make is which parent will have custody. The most common arrangement is for one parent to have custody (both physical and legal) while the other parent has a right of visitation. But it is not uncommon for the parents to share legal custody, even though one parent has physical custody. The most uncommon arrangement is for the parents to share both legal and physical custody.

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (TRO)

An order that tells one person to stop harassing or harming another, issued after the aggrieved party appears before a judge. Once the TRO is issued, the court ... (more...)

An order that tells one person to stop harassing or harming another, issued after the aggrieved party appears before a judge. Once the TRO is issued, the court holds a second hearing where the other side can tell his story and the court can decide whether to make the TRO permanent by issuing an injunction. Although a TRO will often not stop an enraged spouse from acting violently, the police are more willing to intervene if the abused spouse has a TRO.

PETITION (IMMIGRATION)

A formal request for a green card or a specific nonimmigrant (temporary) visa. In many cases, the petition must be filed by someone sponsoring the immigrant, su... (more...)

A formal request for a green card or a specific nonimmigrant (temporary) visa. In many cases, the petition must be filed by someone sponsoring the immigrant, such as a family member or employer. After the petition is approved, the immigrant may submit the actual visa or green card application.

COMMUNITY PROPERTY

A method for defining the ownership of property acquired during marriage, in which all earnings during marriage and all property acquired with those earnings ar... (more...)

A method for defining the ownership of property acquired during marriage, in which all earnings during marriage and all property acquired with those earnings are considered community property and all debts incurred during marriage are community property debts. Community property laws exist in Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. Compare equitable distribution and separate property.

INTERLOCUTORY DECREE

A court judgment that is not final until the judge decides other matters in the case or until enough time has passed to see if the interim decision is working. ... (more...)

A court judgment that is not final until the judge decides other matters in the case or until enough time has passed to see if the interim decision is working. In the past, interlocutory decrees were most often used in divorces. The terms of the divorce were set out in an interlocutory decree, which would become final only after a waiting period. The purpose of the waiting period was to allow the couple time to reconcile. They rarely did, however, so most states no longer use interlocutory decrees of divorce.

CRUELTY

Any act of inflicting unnecessary emotional or physical pain. Cruelty or mental cruelty is the most frequently used fault ground for divorce because as a practi... (more...)

Any act of inflicting unnecessary emotional or physical pain. Cruelty or mental cruelty is the most frequently used fault ground for divorce because as a practical matter, courts will accept minor wrongs or disagreements as sufficient evidence of cruelty to justify the divorce.

COMPARABLE RECTITUDE

A doctrine that grants the spouse least at fault a divorce when both spouses have shown grounds for divorce. It is a response to an old common-law rule that pre... (more...)

A doctrine that grants the spouse least at fault a divorce when both spouses have shown grounds for divorce. It is a response to an old common-law rule that prevented a divorce when both spouses were at fault.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Estep v. Hamilton

... She contends Mr. Hamilton was negligent when representing her in her divorce from Michael Raymond. ... The final papers were silent regarding any re-designation of insurance policy beneficiaries. After the divorce, neither party changed the beneficiary designations. ...

Buchanan v. Buchanan

... 8 "[P]roperty not disposed of by the divorce court is held by the parties as tenants in common." Martin v. Martin, 20 Wash.App. ... Likewise, a surviving spouse military plan not disposed of in a divorce decree is owned by the former spouse as tenants in common. ...

In re Marriage of Obaidi and Qayoum

... Ms. Obaidi asserts that the mahr requires Mr. Qayoum to pay her $20,000 upon divorce. ... We conclude that under neutral principles of contract law, the parties did not enter into an agreement for payment of $20,000 to the wife upon divorce. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bellingham Divorce Lawyer, Washington, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

Washington Family Law Group, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Gregory Louis Kosanke

David G. Laidman

Luigi Colombo

Sara Grigas

Richard Lee

Rajeev D Majumdar

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEST INTERESTS (OF THE CHILD)

PREMARITAL AGREEMENT

CUSTODY (OF A CHILD)

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (TRO)

PETITION (IMMIGRATION)

COMMUNITY PROPERTY

INTERLOCUTORY DECREE

CRUELTY

COMPARABLE RECTITUDE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Estep v. Hamilton

Buchanan v. Buchanan

In re Marriage of Obaidi and Qayoum

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details