Dawn Criminal Lawyer, Texas, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephanie Alvarado
About | Practice Areas
Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
100 N Central Expy Suite 805 Richardson, TX 75080» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Fighting Against Unjust Prosecution

Attorney Stephanie Alvarado is there for her clients when help is needed right away. Helping people charged with crimes in Texas for over 20 years.

800-988-5471
1. Stephanie Alvarado Richardson, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1996
  Baylor University J.D. 1996
2. AboutStephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
  Over 20 Years of Experience
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Robyn Nicole Nance

Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2403 Line Ave, Amarillo, TX 79106

Loreen Lucero

Immigration, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

2201 Civic Cir, Amarillo, TX 79109

Maria Guadalupe Lopez

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

2700 S Western St, Amarillo, TX 79109

Jeff Blackburn

International Other, Criminal, Bankruptcy, Wrongful Death

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

718 Sw 16Th Ave, Amarillo, TX 79101

Cody Michael Pirtle

International Other, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

1008 W 10Th Ave, Amarillo, TX 79101

William R. Taylor

Commercial Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Elder Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

2936 Duniven Cir, Amarillo, TX 79109

James A. Farren

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

2806 Bowie St, Amarillo, TX 79109

Quenton Todd Hatter

Juvenile Law, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

821 Sw 9Th Ave, Amarillo, TX 79101

Charles L. Rittenberry

Criminal

Status: Deceased Licensed: 60 Years

CONTACT

2610 S Hughes St, Amarillo, TX 79109

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

... III. Is Clewis Necessary to Address Some Widespread Criminal Justice Problem That Jackson v. Virginia Is Inadequate To Address. We agree ... review. II. A. Logic Requires a Single Standard of Sufficiency Review in Criminal Cases. I ...

In re Schulman

In re David SCHULMAN. No. AP-75,911. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 30, 2008. 404 John G. Jasuta, Austin, for Appellant. ... We filed and set this matter for consideration. II. A criminal defense attorney's duty is to zealously represent the interests of his client on appeal. ...

Laster v. State

... No. PD-1276-07. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 14, 2009. 515 Kim Campbell, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Kimberly Colliet Wesley, Assistant Criminal District Atty., Fort Worth, Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dawn Criminal Lawyer, Texas, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robyn Nicole Nance

Loreen Lucero

Maria Guadalupe Lopez

Jeff Blackburn

Cody Michael Pirtle

William R. Taylor

James A. Farren

Quenton Todd Hatter

Charles L. Rittenberry

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HOT PURSUIT

FEDERAL COURT

NOLO CONTENDERE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

IMPRISON

SPECIFIC INTENT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

HUNG JURY

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

In re Schulman

Laster v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details