Holts Summit DUI-DWI Lawyer, Missouri

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Shackelford
About | Practice Areas
Law Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.
929 MO-22 P.O. Box 142 Centralia, MO 65240» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
The Highest Quality Of Service

We strive to educate our clients and inform them of their options so we can get them the best results. We are committed to providing the highest quality of service.

800-971-5130
1. Jason Shackelford Centralia, MO
  Attorney at Law - MO, 2001
  Regent University J.D. 2000
2. AboutLaw Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.
  The Highest Quality Of Service
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Adam Dowling

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Personal Injury, DUI-DWI, Wrongful Death

Adam’s practice at Eng & Woods Attorneys at Law includes extensive specializations in the area of criminal law. He represents felony and misdemeanor... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

573-874-4190

903 E. Ash Street, Columbia, MO 65201

Todd Irelan

Household Mold, Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

237 East High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Thomas Robbins Thomas Robbins

DUI-DWI, State Appellate Practice, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

300B E. High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Kimberly Renee Kollmeyer

Commercial Real Estate, Traffic, Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Jefferson City, MO 65110

William Derek Hux

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

401 Court Street, Fulton, MO 65251

Frank O Bowman

Immigration, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

310 Hulston Hall, Columbia, MO 65211

L. G. Copeland

Car Accident, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Railroad Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

900 E Broadway, Columbia, MO 65201

Brent Eric Haden

DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

827 E Broadway, Columbia, MO 65201

Megan Fewell

Administrative Law, Collection, Medical Malpractice, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

401 Locust St., Columbia, MO 65201

Michael Hamilton

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

25 North 9th Street, Columbia, MO 65201

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

FELONY

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases... (more...)

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases, by death. For example, murder, extortion and kidnapping are felonies; a minor fist fight is usually charged as a misdemeanor, and a speeding ticket is generally an infraction.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Turner v. State

... He correctly argues that one of the prior DWI offenses used to enhance the penalty from a class A misdemeanor to a class D felony should not have been considered. After opinion by the Court of Appeals, Western District, this Court granted transfer. Mo. Const, art. V, Â§ 10. ...

Ross v. Director of Revenue

... She then was placed under arrest for driving while intoxicated (DWI), a charge to which she later pleaded guilty. See sec. 577.010, RSMo 2000. [2]. After her arrest for DWI, the officer read Ross the implied consent law for chemical testing. ...

State v. Collins

... PER CURIAM. Faron Ross Collins appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), section 577.010, [1] following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Douglas County. ... Mr. Collins does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to prove that he was guilty of DWI. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Holts Summit DUI-DWI Lawyer, Missouri

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Adam Dowling

Todd Irelan

Thomas Robbins Thomas Robbins

Kimberly Renee Kollmeyer

William Derek Hux

Frank O Bowman

L. G. Copeland

Brent Eric Haden

Megan Fewell

Michael Hamilton

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

VENIREMEN

FEDERAL COURT

CHARGE

DIRECTED VERDICT

HABEAS CORPUS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

FELONY

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Turner v. State

Ross v. Director of Revenue

State v. Collins

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details