Le Roy White Collar Crime Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Le Roy White Collar Crime lawyer.
Below are all Le Roy Criminal lawyers.

Mark D. Johnson

Litigation, Immigration, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

115 West Front Street, Bloomington, IL 61701

James Waller

Internet, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

115 West Front Street, Bloomington, IL 61701

Kimberly Bray

Criminal, Insurance, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

One State Farmplaza, Bloomington, IL 61701

Philip Noel Finegan

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

111 W Front St, Bloomington, IL 61701

Brendan Bukalski

Litigation, Criminal, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

115 W. Front Street, Bloomington, IL 61701

Tristan N. Bullington

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Traffic, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

202 N Center St, Bloomington, IL 61701

Tristan N. Bullington

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

202 North Center Street, Bloomington, IL 61701

Benjamin Charles Fink

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

207 West Jefferson Street, Bloomington, IL 61701

Kevin C Sanborn

Traffic, Lawsuit & Dispute, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

115 W Front St, Bloomington, IL 61701

Kevin Sanborn

Traffic, Lawsuit & Dispute, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

115 W Front St, Bloomington, IL 61701

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Le Roy White Collar Crime Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mark D. Johnson

James Waller

Kimberly Bray

Philip Noel Finegan

Brendan Bukalski

Tristan N. Bullington

Tristan N. Bullington

Benjamin Charles Fink

Kevin C Sanborn

Kevin Sanborn

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

JURY NULLIFICATION

EAVESDROPPING

MOTION IN LIMINE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

IMPEACH

BURGLARY

MENS REA

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details