Millers Falls Felony Lawyer, Massachusetts

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Adam Beck
About | Practice Areas
Adam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.
25 Marston St Suite 303 Lawrence, MA 01841» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

By working with lawyers who are also doctors, clients can benefit from advocates who have a deeper understanding of their physical injuries, medical needs, and prognoses.

800-383-8491
1. Adam Beck Lawrence, MA
  Attorney at Law- MA, 2010
  Massachusetts School of Law, J.D. 2010
2. AboutAdam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Millers Falls Felony lawyer.
Below are all Millers Falls Criminal lawyers.

John J. Stobierski

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

377 Main Street, Greenfield, MA 01301

Marissa Elkins

Criminal, Civil Rights, Motor Vehicle, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

31 trumbull Road, Northampton, MA 01060

Joseph Michael D Kenneally

Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

34 Main Street, Amherst, MA 01002

Daniel M Sandell

Criminal, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

228 Triangle Street, Amherst, MA 01002

David G. Mintz

DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Criminal, Identity Theft

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

17 New South Street, Northampton, MA 01060

Bernadette Stark

Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Consumer Protection

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

922 Campus Center, Amherst, MA 01003

John W. Drake

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

580 Middle Street, Amherst, MA 01002

James Francis Barna

Lawsuit & Dispute, Health Care, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

34 Dana Place, Amherst, MA 01002

Thomas D. Whitney

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

1403 South East Street, Amherst, MA 01002

Derk Allan Wadas

Criminal, State Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

109 N Main Street, Amherst, MA 01002

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Gunter

... Paul Gunter was convicted of murder in the first degree on a theory of felony-murder, in violation of GL c. 265, Â§ 1; armed assault in a dwelling with intent to commit a felony, in violation of GL c. 265, Â§ 18A; and illegal possession of a firearm, in violation of GL c. 269, Â§ 10 (a). This ...

Commonwealth v. Womack

... Catherine Langevin Semel, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth. SPINA, J. The defendant was convicted of felony-murder in the first degree. The underlying felony was an armed robbery while masked. The defendant appealed. ...

Commonwealth v. Young

... relief in both cases from a single justice of this court pursuant to GL c. 211, Â§ 3, contending that possessory firearm offenses come within Â§ 58A (1), which permits the Commonwealth to move for pretrial detention if a defendant has been charged with "any other felony that by its ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Millers Falls Felony Lawyer, Massachusetts

Sponsored Law Firm

Adam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John J. Stobierski

Marissa Elkins

Joseph Michael D Kenneally

Daniel M Sandell

David G. Mintz

Bernadette Stark

John W. Drake

James Francis Barna

Thomas D. Whitney

Derk Allan Wadas

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

SENTENCE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

HOMICIDE

SELF-DEFENSE

MISDEMEANOR

JURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Gunter

Commonwealth v. Womack

Commonwealth v. Young

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details