Rockland Juvenile Law Lawyer, Delaware

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Christofer Johnson
About | Practice Areas
Christofer C. Johnson, Esq.
1201 North Orange St Suite 501 Wilmington, DE 19801» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Get The Support You Need For Your Case

Christofer C. Johnson, Esq. has a track record of successful case outcomes and provides legal counsel for a reasonable price.

800-941-4370
1. Christofer Johnson Wilmington, DE
  Attorney at Law- DE, 2009
  Widener University School of Law, J.D. 2009
2. AboutChristofer C. Johnson, Esq.
  Get The Support You Need For Your Case
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Rockland Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Rockland Criminal lawyers.

Elwood T. Eveland

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Real Estate, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Elwood T. Eveland Jr. is a practicing lawyer in the state of Delaware specializing in Accident & Injury Law. Mr. Evelend received his J.D. from Widene... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-656-9831

715 North King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801

Christofer C. Johnson

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Employment, Business, Accident & Injury, Criminal

Chris Johnson is a native of Philadelphia and graduated from the William Penn Charter School. He received an academic scholarship to the University of... (more)

CONTACT

800-941-4370

704 North King St, Wilmington, DE 19801

Jack M. Willard

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

224 Plymouth Road, Wilmington, DE 19803

Jerome M. Capone

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1823 W. 16th Street, Wilmington, DE 19806

Andrew G. Ahern

Accident & Injury, Contract, Criminal, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

1701 North Market Street, Wilmington, DE 19899

Andrew Joseph Witherell

Criminal, Traffic, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

100 E 14Th Street, Wilmington, DE 19801

John S Malik

Criminal, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

100 E 14Th Street, Wilmington, DE 19801

E. Martin Knepper

Car Accident, Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1228 North King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801

Michael C. Heyden

Estate, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

1201 King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801

L.Vincent Ramunno

Foreclosure, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

903 North French Street, Wilmington, DE 19801

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Rockland Juvenile Law Lawyer, Delaware

Sponsored Law Firm

Christofer C. Johnson, Esq.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Elwood T. Eveland

Christofer C. Johnson

Jack M. Willard

Jerome M. Capone

Andrew G. Ahern

Andrew Joseph Witherell

John S Malik

E. Martin Knepper

Michael C. Heyden

L.Vincent Ramunno

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

SELF-INCRIMINATION

MENS REA

NOLO CONTENDERE

ACQUITTAL

DIRECTED VERDICT

EAVESDROPPING

INFORMED CONSENT

HOT PURSUIT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details