within 20 miles of Greensboro practice in Accident & Injury Georgia


David G. Kopp, P. C.

Accident & Injury, Estate

Cheney Law Group LLC

Criminal, Accident & Injury, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Car Accident

John Frederick Nebl & Associates

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Motor Vehicle, Medical Malpractice

Law Office of R. G. McCauley, P.C.

Real Estate, Government, Medical Malpractice, Consumer Rights, Education

Winkler Law Firm LLC

Business, Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Accident & Injury

Christian G. Henry LLC

Insurance, State and Local, Car Accident, Estate, Education

The Cowart Law Firm P.C.

Bankruptcy & Debt, Accident & Injury

Guy J. Notte & Associates

Criminal, Accident & Injury

Law Office Of Portland Campanaro

Criminal, Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law

Adams & Ford, LLP

State and Local, Estate, Real Estate, Business, Accident & Injury

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Perry v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.

... [12] See Winters v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 209 Ga.App. 369, 370(2), 433 SE2d 363 (1993) (policy language insuring against losses resulting from "bodily injury caused by accident" insured against injury by accidental means). [13] (Footnote omitted.) Provident etc. Ins. ...

Snyder v. State

... Compare OCGA § 40-6-275(c) (drivers of vehicles involved in an accident with no apparent serious personal injury or death have a duty to remove the vehicles from the roadway); OCGA § 40-6-273 (driver of a vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to or the death of ...

Williams v. Whitfield County

... "[The plaintiff] was merely using the bumper of the van for placement of the vise, and the van itself was only remotely related to the accident." [17] We, therefore, concluded that the plaintiff's injury did not "`originate in'" or "`flow from' the use of the van as a motor vehicle." [18]. ...