within 15 miles of Chardon practice in Tax Ohio


Sirvaitis Law LLC.

Estate, Income Tax, Real Estate, Elder Law

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

D + H Usa Corporation

Corporate, Trusts, Elder Law, Tax, Estate Planning

Dev Kuhar Law

Corporate, Trusts, Tax, Estate Planning

The Dicello Firm

Education, Tax, Real Estate, Motor Vehicle, Accident & Injury

Jeffries And Hollingsworth Law Llc

Trusts, Education, Elder Law, Tax, Commercial Real Estate

Dbl Law

Trusts, Entertainment, Tax, Estate Planning

Skoda, Minotti & CO.

International, Business, Tax

Ranallo & Aveni LLC

Entertainment, Commercial Real Estate, Trusts, Corporate, Tax

Wilson And Wilson Co., Lpa - Chagrin Falls

Corporate, Tax, Commercial Banks, Workers' Compensation, Commercial Real Estate

George Gusses Co Lpa

Personal Injury, Trusts, Elder Law, Tax, Estate Planning

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kunkle

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellee, v. KUNKLE et al., Appellant. ... Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Fulton County. ... {¶ 2} "The trial court erred in finding appellant in criminal contempt of court for allegedly giving false testimony at a July, 2004 judgment debtor ...

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Lomaz

{¶ 2} The trial docket before this court shows that the underlying civil action has been pending since July 1998, when appellee filed a creditor's bill against appellant. In its complaint, appellee asserted that it had not been able to collect on a judgment lien that it had obtained ...

CUMMINS PROPERTY v. FRANKLIN CTY.

... Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 106 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-4979, 834 NE2d 782, when it considered and rejected various arguments against using a recent, arm's-length sale price to determine the value of property for taxation purposes. ...