within 15 miles of Norton practice in Intellectual Property Ohio


Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP

Child Custody, Real Estate Other, Intellectual Property

Mckinzie & Associates

Divorce & Family Law, Intellectual Property, Estate, Real Estate

Stark & Knoll Co., LPA

Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Employment, Criminal, Banking & Finance

Leonard & Terzola Co. Ltd.

Corporate, Tax, Commercial Banks, Intellectual Property

Lensman & Associates, Ltd.

Intellectual Property

Edward F. Whipps & Associates, Llc

Litigation, Intellectual Property

Bruce H. Wilson

Antitrust, Intellectual Property, Federal Appellate Practice, Business & Trade, Litigation

Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP

Commercial Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Corporate, Construction, Commercial Banks

Goldman & Rosen, Ltd.

Intellectual Property, Wrongful Termination, Immigration, Consumer Rights, Social Security

David M. Lowry, Atty. at Law

Intellectual Property, Business, Corporate, Electronic Commerce, Litigation

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Troisi

... Tavano sought Richissin's assistance because of his background as a well-known investigator of intellectual-property crimes. ... He testified that he is a sergeant with the Cleveland Police 331 Department who principally investigates crimes involving intellectual property. ...

Am. Chem. Soc. v. Leadscope

... I. Procedural History. {¶2} The civil action subject of this appeal arises from an intellectual property dispute between ACS and three of its former employees, Blower, Johnson, and Myatt (collectively, "individual defendants"). The ...

State v. Troisi

... and 2380742, 0916522, 2022789, and 1057884)—the victim is best suited to identify which elements were registered as marks and which may have been counterfeited." (Emphasis added.) United States Department of Justice, Prosecuting Intellectual Property Crimes (3d Ed ...