within 15 miles of Norton practice in Tax Ohio


Richard D. Honeck, Attorney at Law

Real Estate, Estate, Tax, Business

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Maistros & Loep Ltd

Corporate, Business Organization, Estate Planning, Tax, International

Christopher P. Judge, Attorney at Law

Bankruptcy, Trusts, Commercial Real Estate, Tax, Estate Planning

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP

Litigation, Corporate, Tax, Personal Injury, Commercial Banks

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Llp

Corporate, Tax, Elder Law, International Other, Estate Planning

Leonard & Terzola Co. Ltd.

Banking & Finance, Corporate, Tax, Business, International

Leonard & Terzola Co. Ltd.

Corporate, Tax, Commercial Banks, Intellectual Property

Stark And Knoll Co, Lpa

Corporate, Estate Planning, Tax, Litigation, Trusts

Icove Legal Group Ltd

Corporate, Trusts, Tax, Commercial Real Estate, Estate Planning

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kunkle

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellee, v. KUNKLE et al., Appellant. ... Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Fulton County. ... {¶ 2} "The trial court erred in finding appellant in criminal contempt of court for allegedly giving false testimony at a July, 2004 judgment debtor ...

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Lomaz

{¶ 2} The trial docket before this court shows that the underlying civil action has been pending since July 1998, when appellee filed a creditor's bill against appellant. In its complaint, appellee asserted that it had not been able to collect on a judgment lien that it had obtained ...

CUMMINS PROPERTY v. FRANKLIN CTY.

... Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 106 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-4979, 834 NE2d 782, when it considered and rejected various arguments against using a recent, arm's-length sale price to determine the value of property for taxation purposes. ...