Springville RICO Act Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Springville RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Springville Criminal lawyers.

Martin Malkasian

DUI-DWI, Litigation, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2912 West Main Street, Visalia, CA 93291

Robert Erbar Vanderhorst

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

Porterville, CA 93258

Robert Krase

Other, Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

132 E Morton Ave, Porterville, CA 93257

David Lange

Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

720 W. Center Avenue, Visalia, CA 93291

Greg Hagopian

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

115 S Church St, Visalia, CA 93291

Christopher Lionel Haberman

Other, Criminal, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

113 N Church St, Visalia, CA 93291

Kenn Allen Bovetti

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

204 N Floral, Visalia, CA 93291

David Wayne Allen

Family Law, Adoption, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

805 W Main St, Visalia, CA 93291

Andrew James Stark

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

221 S Mooney Blvd, Visalia, CA 93291

Ronald Allen Westphal

Criminal, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

221 S Mooney Blvd, Visalia, CA 93291

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Springville RICO Act Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Martin Malkasian

Robert Erbar Vanderhorst

Robert Krase

David Lange

Greg Hagopian

Christopher Lionel Haberman

Kenn Allen Bovetti

David Wayne Allen

Andrew James Stark

Ronald Allen Westphal

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

SENTENCE

IMPRISON

BURDEN OF PROOF

NOLLE PROSEQUI

DIRECTED VERDICT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details