Stilesville Criminal Lawyer, Indiana, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Eric Krupp
About | Practice Areas
Sallee Law, LLC.
155 E. Market St. Suite 860 Indianapolis, IN 46204» view map
Criminal Defense
Better Call Sallee

At Sallee Law, LLC, we believe in providing a true defense.

800-853-6180
1. Eric Krupp Indianapolis, IN
  Attorney at Law-IN
  Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, J.D.
2. AboutSallee Law, LLC.
  Better Call Sallee
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Christopher Austin Parker

Juvenile Law, Trusts, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

One South Washington Street, Danville, IN 46122

James Lee Lowry

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Business, Accident & Injury

Status: Deceased Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

1 South Washington St, Danville, IN 46122

Reid Jay Roethe

Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

52 West Main, Danville, IN 46122

Scott William Knierim

Criminal, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

52 West Main St., Danville, IN 46122

Gregory Wilson Black

Landlord-Tenant, Immigration, Family Law, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

2 Mark Manor, Danville, IN 46122

Graham T. Youngs

Other, Lawsuit & Dispute, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

106 N. Washington St., Danville, IN 46122

Douglas Wayne Meyer

Juvenile Law, Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

Plainfield, IN 46168

Terry Mark Kessinger

Government, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

Danville, IN 46122

Elizabeth Marie Smith

Juvenile Law, Dispute Resolution, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

2 W. Main Street, Mooresville, IN 46158

Lisa Diane Manning

Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

110 South Center Street, Plainfield, IN 46168

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Henley v. State

... In August 1998 Antwain Henley was charged with attempted murder, a Class A felony, two counts of kidnapping as Class A felonies, two counts of robbery as Class B felonies, carjacking as a Class B felony, and criminal mischief as a Class D felony. ...

State v. Davis

... 49A02-0706-CR-545. RUCKER, Justice. Today we examine the question of whether it is a violation of fundamental fairness to hold criminal charges over the head of an incompetent defendant who will never be able to stand trial. The answer in this case is yes. ...

Wallace v. State

... See Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website, http://www.nsopr.gov (last visited April 23, 2009). Criminal penalties associated with the duty to register have increased as well. ... 5. Application Only to Criminal Behavior. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Stilesville Criminal Lawyer, Indiana, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Sallee Law, LLC.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Christopher Austin Parker

James Lee Lowry

Reid Jay Roethe

Scott William Knierim

Gregory Wilson Black

Graham T. Youngs

Douglas Wayne Meyer

Terry Mark Kessinger

Elizabeth Marie Smith

Lisa Diane Manning

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

IMPEACH

BURGLARY

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SPECIFIC INTENT

PROBABLE CAUSE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

WARRANT

INTERROGATION

MENS REA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Henley v. State

State v. Davis

Wallace v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details