University Criminal Lawyer, Mississippi, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Murphy
About | Practice Areas
Smith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC
1109 Van Buren Ave Oxford, MS 38655» view map
Accident & Injury and Criminal Defense
Smart, Efficient, Precise

Fair legal work for fair compensation. We are straight-forward in our communications with clients and return all emails and phone calls within twenty-four (24) hours.

800-894-6061
1. Joseph Murphy Oxford, MS
  Attorney at Law- MS, 2013
  University of Mississippi School of Law, J.D. 2013
2. AboutSmith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC
  Smart, Efficient, Precise
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

James Lance Butler

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

707 Van Buren Ave, Oxford, MS 38655

James Henry Jones

Contract, Collection, Lawsuit & Dispute, Medical Malpractice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

Oxford, MS 38655

Jesse Marion Mcright

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

1205 Office Park Dr, Oxford, MS 38655

John S. Farese

Lawsuit & Dispute, Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

720 N Lamar Blvd, Oxford, MS 38655

John Booth Farese

Mass Torts, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

720 N Lamar Blvd, Oxford, MS 38655

John Matthew Orr

Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 7 Years

CONTACT

720B N Lamar Blvd, Oxford, MS 38655

Joshua Aaron Turner

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Oxford, MS 38655

Joshua Aaron Turner

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Oxford, MS 38655

Judd Freeman Osten

Divorce, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

145 Rosemont Loop, Oxford, MS 38655

Kenneth H. Coghlan

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Business

Status: Inactive Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

1009 Hayes Avenue, Oxford, MS 38655

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Coleman v. State

... 4. Coleman is only partially correct. Trotter does state that a criminal defendant who pleads guilty may challenge the sentence that results from the guilty plea on direct appeal, even though he or she may not challenge the conviction that results from a guilty plea. ...

Burrough v. State

... that night outside Bill Ashmore's Wrecker Service establishment by a deputy from the Grenada County Sheriff's Office who had been notified by the Mississippi Highway Patrol that two of its patrolmen had detained Burrough at that location on suspicion of criminal activity at the ...

Jordan v. State

... doubt. See, eg, Miller v. State, 980 So.2d 927, 929 (Miss.2008) (noting that the burden of proof for criminal cases is proof beyond a reasonable doubt). A. Identification of the Shooter and the Motion for Directed Verdict. Â¶ 24. Jordan ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

University Criminal Lawyer, Mississippi, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Smith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

James Lance Butler

James Henry Jones

Jesse Marion Mcright

John S. Farese

John Booth Farese

John Matthew Orr

Joshua Aaron Turner

Joshua Aaron Turner

Judd Freeman Osten

Kenneth H. Coghlan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CHARGE

GRAND JURY

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

CAPITAL CASE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

PROBABLE CAUSE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Coleman v. State

Burrough v. State

Jordan v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details