Arkansas Workers Compensation and Objective Medical Findings.

by Steven R. Mcneely on Jun. 07, 2019

Employment Workers' Compensation 

Summary: Arkansas Workers Compensation and Objective Medical Findings. This is one of those laws that sound good, unless it happens to you.

In the year 1993, the Arkansas Legislatures passed Act 796.  This Act, completely rewrote the Arkansas Workers Compensation System.  (This Act has been called draconian by some, including the author)

One part of the law was to provide that the employer were not responsible for any injury that was not supported by an “objective medical finding”.  This basically means something the medical provider can see.

Examples of objective medical findings are:

1. A broken bone on an x-ray
2. A herniate disc on an MRI
3. Bruising,
4. Swelling,
5. Muscle spasms,
6. An abnormal nerve study,
6. Ect,

The Law went on to direct all Administrative law Judges, Full Commissioners and the Arkansas Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, not to consider complaints of pain or restricted motion in establishing any work related injury.

Originally this sounded good.  Basically why should the employer and the insurance carrier have to pay benefits when all the doctors in the world can not find any thing wrong with the worker.

However, the Arkansas injured worker, will not see every doctor in the world, in fact they will only see the doctor selected by the employer or the insurance carrier and you can bet, they will not select doctors who give the worker the benefit of the doubt.  Over the last several years in Arkansas a lot of good doctors who want to help patients, have learned not to accept a workers compensation case.


Also most medical problems are internal, how do you see those?  


Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(4)(A) defines “compensable injury”: (a)n accidental injury causing internal or external physical harm to the body or accidental injury to prosthetic appliances, including eyeglasses, contact lenses, or hearing aids, arising out of and in the course of employment and which requires medical services or results in disability or death. An injury is “accidental”only if it is caused by a specific incident and is identifiable by time and place of occurrence. A compensable injury must be established by medical evidence supported by objective findings. Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(4)(D). Claimant’s burden of proof shall be a preponderance of the evidence. Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(4)(E)(i). If claimant fails to establish by a preponderance of the evidence any of the requirements for establishing the compensability of the injury alleged, he fails to establish the compensability of the claim, and compensation must be denied.


                            

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.