Ask A Lawyer

Tell Us Your Case Information for Fastest Lawyer Match!

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involoves.
Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.


By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided may not be privileged or confidential.

Cat v. Copycat: Copyright Infringement Litigation Overview.

by Armen Kiramijyan on Dec. 05, 2013

Intellectual Property Copyright Intellectual Property  Trademark Lawsuit & Dispute  Litigation 

Summary: If you have a registered copyright you may legally enforce your rights against all infringers of that copyright by filing a Complaint.

If you have a registered copyright you may legally enforce your rights against all infringers of that copyright by filing a Complaint. 

Copyright litigation begins with the Plaintiff filing a Complaint in federal court. When Plaintiff serves Defendant with the Complaint, the Defendant must file a responsive pleading, usually either an Answer or a Motion to Dismiss, within 21 days of service.  If the Complaint holds water and is not dismissed for inadequacies at this point, the parties then engage in discovery. 

Discovery includes issuing and responding to requests for information concerning the case.  The longest and most important phase of copyright litigation is the discovery phase. When it is completed, the case then proceeds toward a Motion for Summary Judgment.  In a Motion for Summary Judgment the plaintiff or the defendant is basically asking the court to use all the facts gathered in the discovery phase and decide the case without trial.  The rational is that if there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, than the judge can decide the matter with all the information presented.  If the case survives a Motion for Summary Judgment then it is worth money.  As every good litigator knows, if the case goes to the jury, the outcome is highly unpredictable.  Thus, at this point all parties have a great incentive to settle. 

The main things a plaintiff needs to establish is:  First, whether a substantial similarity exists between the two works.  Second, whether the alleged infringer had access to the original work.

The remedies available in copyright litigation includes:  an injunction, money damages, profits of the infringer, statutory damages, costs, and attorney’s fees. Statutory damages and attorney’s fees are usually only available when the copyright at issue was registered prior to the infringement. In the Unites States a three month grace period may exist. It is of great benefit to be able to recover statutory damages because in copyright infringement matters actual damages are difficult to prove.

What to take away from all this.  If you have a copyright register it immediately. Further, if you suspect as the Cat or the Copycat needs more information, consult with a copyright attorney to assess your assets or liabilities. 

This content is intended for educational purposes only. 

KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California.   The above content is intended for California residents only.  This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website.  The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship.  KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office.  KAASS LAW helps clients in: Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood.

 



Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.