2. Legal Articles
  3. Employment

REFINE BY AREAS

Search Legal Articles

Legal Articles, Employment

Balancing Policy Concerns When Determining Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreement

Booth Waltz Enterprises, Inc. v. Pierson, 2009 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1912

Contractual Imposition of a Penalty for Breach Violates Connecticut Law & Policy

PRF of Connecticut, Inc. v. Gosselin, 1993 Conn. Super. LEXIS 3201

Requisite Proof to Demonstrate Irreparable Harm in Connection to Breach of Non-Compete

VBrick Systems, Inc. v. Stephens, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45835

Identifying de facto Geographical Limitations in Connecticut Non-Compete Agreement

New Haven Tobacco Company operated a wholesale tobacco business and entered into an employment contract with Mr. Frank Perrelli in December 1980.  As part of the contract, Mr. Perrelli signed a non-compete agreement wherein he agreed to “not directly or indirectly sell products similar to those of the Employer (New Haven Tobacco Co.) to any of the customers he has dealt with or has discovered and became aware of while in the employ of the Employer for a period of twenty-four months from the termination of his employment”.

Imminent Risk of Irreparable Harm is Requisite for Enforcing Non-Compete Agreements

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. Francavilla, 191 F.Supp.2d 270

Retention of Confidential Information is a Clear Breach of Non-Compete According to Connecticut Court

TyMetrix, Inc. v. Szymonik, 2006 Conn. Super. LEXIS 3865

De Facto New Employment Relationship Precludes Restrictive Covenant Enforcement By Successor Employer

Kelly Services, Inc. v. Savic, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83930

Inadequate Evidence to Prove Indirect Solicitation

PCRE v. Unger, 2010 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1129

Both Parties Must Sign Non-Compete Agreement To Make It Legally Binding

Fairfaxx Corp. v. Nickelson, 2000 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2340

The Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Provisions in Non-Compete Agreements

The Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Provisions in Non-Compete Agreements

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.