Lane DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oklahoma

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Monty Pritchett
About | Practice Areas
Pritchett Law Group
126 West Needles Avenue Bixby, OK 74008» view map
Estate Law
A Focus On Results

Don't wait! Contact us for a free phone consultation. Let us help you figure out what your next best steps are

918-509-3891
1. Monty Pritchett Bixby, OK
  Attorney at Law, OK
  University of Oklahoma College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutPritchett Law Group
  A Focus On Results
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Lane DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Lane Criminal lawyers.

Dale Ronald Rex

Accident & Injury, Bankruptcy, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Ada, OK 74821

Charlie Michele Rowland

Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

408 E. Main Street, Antlers, OK 74523

Donald David Haggerty

Commercial Real Estate, Real Estate, Criminal, Business & Trade

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

121 N 3Rd Ave, Durant, OK 74701

Gary Russell Washington

Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

130 N 3Rd Ave, Durant, OK 74701

Gina Marella Tur South

Elder Law, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Non-profit

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 7 Years

CONTACT

Durant, OK 74702

Gregory Steven Jenkins

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

201 E Court St, Atoka, OK 74525

Jeff Clark

Criminal, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

125 N 3Rd Ave, Durant, OK 74701

Jim H. Kemp

Workers' Compensation, Divorce, Personal Injury, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

830 N Broadway Street, Ada, OK 74821

Jon Ed Brown

Insurance, Family Law, Medical Malpractice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

101 S 4Th St, Hugo, OK 74743

Stephen R. Taylor

Estate Planning, Family Law, Civil Rights, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

119 N 3Rd Ave, Durant, OK 74701

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Jobe v. STATE EX REL. DPS.

... 2 The Department of Public Safety (DPS) revoked Jordan J. Jobe's (motorist, licensee or Jobe) driver's license for a three-year period for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) following his third alcohol-related offense committed within five years. ...

Gilworth v. STATE EX REL. DPS.

... Defendant/Appellee, Oklahoma Department of Public Safety (DPS), revoked Gilworth's driver's license because he had a prior conviction within ten years of the arrest giving rise to the most recent conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). ...

Harney v. State

... III. The Trial Court Committed Reversible Error When It Refused To Instruct The Jury On The Full Range of Punishment For Felony DUI. IV. Reversible Prosecutorial Misconduct Occurred When The Prosecutor Asked 1004 Harney ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Lane DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oklahoma

Sponsored Law Firm

Pritchett Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Dale Ronald Rex

Charlie Michele Rowland

Donald David Haggerty

Gary Russell Washington

Gina Marella Tur South

Gregory Steven Jenkins

Jeff Clark

Jim H. Kemp

Jon Ed Brown

Stephen R. Taylor

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

HABEAS CORPUS

INDECENT EXPOSURE

VENIREMEN

BURDEN OF PROOF

IMPEACH

FEDERAL COURT

DIRECTED VERDICT

INFORMED CONSENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Jobe v. STATE EX REL. DPS.

Gilworth v. STATE EX REL. DPS.

Harney v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details