Louisville Criminal Lawyer, Kentucky, page 7

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Larry Forman
About Us | Contact Us
Larry Forman Law, PLLC
138 South Third Street, Suite 209 Louisville, KY 40202Â» view map
DUI, Car Accident, Criminal Defense
Top Rated Kentucky DUI Defense Lawyer

I understand the need to prepare a strong defense and takes every case seriously and personally. I will fight to get you justice. I offer free consultations, contact me today.

800-926-1391
1. Larry Forman Louisville,KY
  Attorney at Law-KY, 2013
  University of Louisville, J.D. 2013
2. About UsLarry Forman
  I have extensive experience handling jury,bench trials and hearings.
3. Contact UsCall or Email Now
  Call NOW for a FREE CONSULTATION!
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Daniel Michael Alvarez

Mass Torts, Immigration, Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

539 W Market St, Louisville, KY 40202

Casey Alan Krill

Divorce & Family Law, Real Estate, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Estate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

600 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202

Jennifer K Adams

Criminal, Premises Liability, Products Liability, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

614 W Main St, Louisville, KY 40202

Jane Ann Tyler

Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1850 Trough Springs Ln, Louisville, KY 40205

Robert Anthony Chandler

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

214 South 8Th Street, Louisville, KY 40202

Brendan R Daugherty

Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

214 S 8th St., Louisville, KY 40202

Scott Harper

DUI-DWI, Property Damage, Personal Injury, Car Accident

Licensed: 9 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2300 Hurstbourne Village Dr., Louisville, KY 40299

Emily Nicole Farrar-Crockett

Criminal, Immigration, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2300 Hurstbourne Village Drive, Louisville, KY 40299

Allison Louise Rief

Criminal, Family Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Mediation

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

8005 Lyndon Centre Way, Louisville, KY 40222

John Michael Mack

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1045 East St. Catherine Street, Louisville, KY 40204

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Padilla

... Supreme Court of Kentucky. January 24, 2008. Rehearing Denied June 19, 2008. 483 Jack Conway, Attorney General of Kentucky, David A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Appellate Division, Office of the Attorney General, Frankfort, KY, Counsel for Appellant. ...

Hartsfield v. Com.

... They are testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no such ongoing emergency, and that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially 244 relevant to later criminal prosecution. [18]. ...

Leonard v. Com.

... for Appellant. Jack Conway, Attorney General, David A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, Criminal Appellate Division, Frankfort, KY, for Appellee. Opinion of the Court by Justice NOBLE. Appellant ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Louisville Criminal Lawyer, Kentucky, page 7

Sponsored Law Firm

Larry Forman Law, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Daniel Michael Alvarez

Casey Alan Krill

Jennifer K Adams

Jane Ann Tyler

Robert Anthony Chandler

Brendan R Daugherty

Scott Harper

Emily Nicole Farrar-Crockett

Allison Louise Rief

John Michael Mack

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

BAIL BOND

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SELF-DEFENSE

CONVICTION

LARCENY

LINEUP

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Padilla

Hartsfield v. Com.

Leonard v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details