Rockwell DUI-DWI Lawyer, North Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

C. Randolph Emory
About | Practice Areas
The Emory Law Firm
11020 David Taylor Dr. Suite 102 Charlotte, NC 28262» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Our People Make The Difference

We’re dedicated to ensuring that we take care of all of our clients, and that their legal needs are met and exceeded. We offer high-quality legal work and personal client service.

800-972-6341
1. C. Randolph Emory Charlotte, NC
  Attorney at Law - NC, 1990
  North Carolina Central University J.D.
2. AboutThe Emory Law Firm
  We Fight For You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Andrew P. Clement

Traffic, Social Security -- Disability, Criminal, Accident & Injury, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

x, Kannapolis, NC 28082

Ben Allen Cox

Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

Concord, NC 28026

Ben Allen Cox

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

Concord, NC 28026

Christopher William Shelburn

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Household Mold

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

67 Cabarrus Ave, Concord, NC 28025

Corry Jermaine Brannen

Prosecution, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Race Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

145 Union Street South, Concord, NC 28025

Duane S. Miller

Real Estate, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

P.O. Box 744, Concord, NC 28026

H. J. White

Workers' Compensation, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

71 Mccachern Blvd. S.E., Concord, NC 28026

Laura M. Baker

Family Law, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

145 Union Street South, Concord, NC 28025

Robert Paterson Mckinney

DUI-DWI, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

300 Concord Pkwy, South, Concord, NC 28027

Taylor Laumann Conner

Criminal, Traffic, Estate, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

964 Copperfield Boulevard, Concord, NC 28025

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Maready

... That record reflected a total of six previous driving while impaired ("DWI") convictions. The Court of Appeals majority held it was not plain error to admit the entire driving record. 149 NCApp. ... Like the Goodman defendant, defendant here had six previous DWI convictions. ...

State v. Peele

... Defendant Lucian Jefferson Peele, Jr. appeals from his conviction for driving while impaired ("DWI"). ... The test recorded an alcohol concentration of.08, and defendant was issued a DWI citation. Defendant was found guilty of DWI in Martin County district court on 2 July 2007. ...

State v. Veazey

... On 1 January 2006, defendant Thomas Marland Veazey was charged with driving without a valid license and driving while impaired ("DWI") after being stopped at a driver's license checkpoint. Defendant was found guilty of DWI in district court and appealed to superior court. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Rockwell DUI-DWI Lawyer, North Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

The Emory Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Andrew P. Clement

Ben Allen Cox

Ben Allen Cox

Christopher William Shelburn

Corry Jermaine Brannen

Duane S. Miller

H. J. White

Laura M. Baker

Robert Paterson Mckinney

Taylor Laumann Conner

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

NOLLE PROSEQUI

INFORMED CONSENT

MISDEMEANOR

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

ARREST WARRANT

PLEA BARGAIN

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Maready

State v. Peele

State v. Veazey

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details