Wyoming Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Akiva Goldman
About | Practice Areas
Goldman & Associates
615 Griswold St. Suite 1325 Detroit, MI 48226Â» view map
Criminal
Over 30 Years Experience.

Accessibility, responsiveness, and personal commitment is our approach to client representation.

800-797-8031
1. Akiva Goldman Detroit, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1986
  Wayne State University J.D. 1986
2. AboutGoldman & Associates
  Our firm has quick and easy access to all courts in the metro Detroit area.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael R. Bartish

Military, Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

60 Monroe Center St Nw, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Matthew G. Borgula

Federal, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

60 Monroe Center St Nw, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Leticia Perez

Immigration, Family Law, Criminal, Children's Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

146 Monroe Center St Nw, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Judith A. Baxter

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Misdemeanor, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

230 Fulton St E, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Jason William Siffert

Estate Administration, Divorce, Adoption, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

180 Monroe Ave, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Daniel R. Fagan

Other, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

429 Turner Ave Nw, Grand Rapids, MI 49504

Peter Alan Vangelderen

Employment Discrimination, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

300 Ottawa Ave Nw, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Britt Morton Cobb

Other, Immigration, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

300 Ottawa Avenue, NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Kara Rae Sova

Motor Vehicle, Litigation, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

465 Baldwin St, Jenison, MI 49428

Matthew L. Vicari

Litigation, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

45 Ottawa Ave Sw, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Wyoming Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

Goldman & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael R. Bartish

Matthew G. Borgula

Leticia Perez

Judith A. Baxter

Jason William Siffert

Daniel R. Fagan

Peter Alan Vangelderen

Britt Morton Cobb

Kara Rae Sova

Matthew L. Vicari

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

JURY NULLIFICATION

INTERROGATION

PROSECUTE

ACCOMPLICE

ASSAULT

FEDERAL COURT

INTENTIONAL TORT

CRIMINAL CASE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details