2. Legal Articles
  3. Immigration
  4. Secretary Kelly Reports Sharp Decline in Apprehensions at the Southwest Border in March 2017

REFINE BY AREAS

Search Legal Articles

Secretary Kelly Reports Sharp Decline in Apprehensions at the Southwest Border in March 2017

by Alexander J. Segal on May. 23, 2017

Immigration Immigration  Deportation Immigration  Visa 

Summary: In this post, I will focus exclusively on an interesting section of Secretary Kelly's testimony regarding promising signs related to immigration enforcement at the border.

immigration attorney nycINTRODUCTION

On April 5, 2017, the Secretary of Homeland Security, John F. Kelly, issued written testimony for a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental affairs hearing titled "Improving Border Security and Public Safety" [link]. In the testimony, Secretary Kelly discusses the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS's) border security mission, President Donald Trump's immigration Executive Orders [see article on border/interior enforcement orders; and see article on travel order], President Trump's budget proposal [see blog], and interagency and international cooperation. In this post, I will focus exclusively on an interesting section of Secretary Kelly's testimony regarding promising signs related to immigration enforcement at the border.

EARLY INDICATIONS OF SUCCESS FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRESIDENT'S EXECUTIVE ORDERS

In his written testimony, Secretary Kelly explains that the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has seen a sharp decline in apprehensions along the Southwest Border since the beginning of the year. This is significant because the number of apprehensions at the border is generally seen as an indicator of how many aliens are seeking to cross the border illegally.

Secretary Kelly stated that March saw than 17,000 apprehensions at the border. That was the lowest total of 2017, and notably marked the fifth consecutive month of declines in arrests at the border. Specifically, Secretary Kelly estimated that the number of apprehensions in March would be approximately 71% lower than the December 2016 total. The decrease in apprehensions is notable because - as Secretary Kelly explained - the DHS typically sees an increase in the number of apprehensions early in the year.

Secretary Kelly attributed the decrease in apprehensions in part to the new policies being pursued by the Trump Administration.

ANALYSIS

On April 5, 2017, the White House Press Secretary released a statement echoing Secretary Kelly's testimony [link]. In March of 2017, only 16,600 individuals were apprehended or deemed inadmissible at the Southwest Border. This represented a 35% drop from the already low numbers in February of 2017, and a stunning 64% drop from March of 2016. The San Diego Tribune notes that the number of apprehensions (not counting those deemed inadmissible) is estimated to be fewer than 12,500 [link].[1] This not only represented a low number for March, but was in fact the lowest number of apprehensions in any month in the last 17 years.

To be sure, many factors go into how many apprehensions occur at the border. However, the dwindling number of apprehensions at the border in the first two full months of the Trump Administration must be taken as a promising sign. It will be important to follow the numbers as the DHS begins hiring new agents and fully implementing the directives in President Trump's Executive Orders on border security and interior enforcement.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

1. Morrissey, Kate. "March border apprehensions reported to hit 17-year low." Sandiegotribute.com. (Apr. 4, 2017)

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.