Guardian Ad Litem Can Ditch Case

by Joseph C. Maya on Mar. 27, 2024

Divorce & Family Law 

Summary: The Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport considered a plaintiff’s motion to open, seeking to reopen a stipulation she signed regarding a motion to modify custody regarding guardian ad litem. Upon review, the court denied the motion.

Case Background

In 2007, a guardian ad litem (guardian) was appointed to assist the parties in developing a parenting plan. This plan was incorporated in the decree of dissolution the following year. Additional motions were made regarding custody and visitation, which were sporadically certified to the guardian, and in June 2008, a stipulation was signed by both parties, but not by the guardian. In November 2008, a new GAL was appointed by the court, who signed a March 2009 stipulation regarding financial, custody, and visitation matters. Thereafter, the defendant filed a motion to modify custody, and in September 2010, the parties met with family relations and signed a new stipulation, which the court approved.

The Court’s Decision

The plaintiff sought to set aside this stipulation. She argued that the guardian should have received notice of the motion and claimed that the guardian remains in a case until affirmatively removed by the court. She cited a case that gave the court authority to have a guardian remain appointed on a “stand by basis” even after proceedings close. Fish v. Fish, 90 Conn. App. 744. The court distinguished that case, noting that the court in Fish specifically ordered the guardian to remain in the case knowing there would be future need for the guardian. The same could not be said in the present matter: the court noted the passage of time, the unknown availability of the guardian, and malpractice considerations.


Maya Murphy P.C. has proudly been included in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®, ranked among the top firms in the nation. In addition, Managing Partner Joseph C. Maya has been selected to The Best Lawyers in America® 2024 for his work in Employment Law and Education Law in Connecticut. Recognition in Best Lawyers® is awarded to firms and attorneys who demonstrate excellence in the industry, and is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor.

Our firm in Westport, Connecticut serves clients with legal assistance all over the state, including the towns of: Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Bethany, Bethel, Branford, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Cheshire, Danbury, Darien, Derby, East Haven, Easton, Fairfield, Greenwich, Guilford, Hamden, Madison, Meriden, Middlebury, Milford, Monroe, Naugatuck, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Haven, Newton, North Branford, North Haven, Norwalk, Orange, Oxford, Prospect, Redding, Ridgefield, Seymour, Shelton, Sherman, Southbury, Stamford, Stratford, Trumbull, Wallingford, Waterbury, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wilton, and Woodbridge. In addition to assisting clients in Connecticut, our firm handles education law and employment law matters in New York as well. 

If you have any questions about employment law or education law in Connecticut, or would like to speak to an attorney about a legal matter, please contact Joseph C. Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com to schedule a free initial consultation today.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.