Physician Obtains Downward Modification to Alimony Obligation

by Joseph C. Maya on Mar. 27, 2024

Divorce & Family Law 

Summary: In a post-judgment divorce action, a physician was successful in obtaining a downward modification to his alimony obligation due to a substantial decrease in his income.  The parties were divorced back in 2007, and pursuant to the judgment of dissolution, the husband was required to pay alimony to the wife in the amount of $6,000 per month for a period of eleven months, followed by $5,000 per month thereafter.  The amount of the alimony obligation was modifiable upon a substantial change in circumstances in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes § 46b-86.

Presumably upon a motion by the wife, the husband’s obligation was subsequently modified to $5,666.66 per month, or $68,000.00 per year, in November of 2007.  The defendant’s wife filed a second motion to modify in 2010.  At that time, the husband’s income had increased from $4,038.00 gross per week at the time of judgment to $5,356.00 gross per week at the time of the hearing on the wife’s motion.

The Court’s Decision

By way of a motion dated October 26, 2011, the husband sought a modification of his own.  Following a hearing on said motion, the court found that the husband originally worked for a hospital in Connecticut, but voluntarily left after experiencing complications with his eye, which impacted his ability to meet the demands of the position.  The defendant was unemployed for a period of time before accepting a new position in New York which paid less than his former employer, but which also provided accommodations for his eye complications.

While in between jobs, the plaintiff unilaterally reduced his alimony payments to $3,000 per month.  Evidently accepting the husband’s medical condition as justification for voluntarily leaving his employer, and excusing what may have otherwise constituted a voluntary reduction in income, the court found that the change in the husband’s earnings did in fact constitute a substantial change in circumstances, and reduced his alimony obligation back to $5,000 per month.


Maya Murphy P.C. has proudly been included in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®, ranked among the top firms in the nation. In addition, Managing Partner Joseph C. Maya has been selected to The Best Lawyers in America® 2024 for his work in Employment Law and Education Law in Connecticut. Recognition in Best Lawyers® is awarded to firms and attorneys who demonstrate excellence in the industry, and is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor.

Our firm in Westport, Connecticut serves clients with legal assistance all over the state, including the towns of: Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Bethany, Bethel, Branford, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Cheshire, Danbury, Darien, Derby, East Haven, Easton, Fairfield, Greenwich, Guilford, Hamden, Madison, Meriden, Middlebury, Milford, Monroe, Naugatuck, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Haven, Newton, North Branford, North Haven, Norwalk, Orange, Oxford, Prospect, Redding, Ridgefield, Seymour, Shelton, Sherman, Southbury, Stamford, Stratford, Trumbull, Wallingford, Waterbury, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wilton, and Woodbridge. In addition to assisting clients in Connecticut, our firm handles education law and employment law matters in New York as well. 

If you have any questions about employment law or education law in Connecticut, or would like to speak to an attorney about a legal matter, please contact Joseph C. Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com to schedule a free initial consultation today.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.