UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT (UNPUBLISHED OPINION)

by Judith S Danso on Nov. 12, 2015

Criminal 

Summary: Unpublished Opinion on Consolidated Appeal Challenging Fraud Related Convictions

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,

    v.

ERICA BROWN,
   Defendant-Appellant.
____________________________________


Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00162-JKB-1; 1:11-CR-00162-JKB-2)
____________________________________


Argued:  September 20, 2013 Decided: November 27, 2013
____________________________________

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and Samuel G. WILSON, United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

____________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished opinion.  Judge Wilson wrote the opinion, in which Judge Gregory and Judge Duncan joined.

____________________________________

ARGUED:  John O. Iweanoge, II, IWEANOGE LAW CENTER, Washington, D.C.; Judith Antwi Sakyi, LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH A. SAKYI, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellants.  Barbara Slaymaker Sale, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.  ON BRIEF:  Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.


WISLON, District Judge:

"This is a consolidated appeal by Lamondes Williams and Erica Brown challenging their fraud related convictions for operating a vehicle "rent-to-own" program in which their customers were not actually acquiring ownership interest in the vehicles they were renting.  They claim that the evidence was insufficient to show a scheme to defraud.  In addition, Williams claims the district court erred in permitting his conspiracy conviction to stand in light of Brown's acquittal of that offense, admitting evidence that he had engaged in other similar schemes, and in applying certain sentencing enhancements.

The rest of the opinion can be found via the following link:

www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Unpublished/124167.U.pdf

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.